Boy Erased film screenings

Join us to watch the unreleased film, Boy Erased and take action against conversion therapy and sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts in Australia.

Thousands of Australians have taken action to end conversion therapy and sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts. Believe it or not, sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts still happen in Australia today. Therapy tries to make LGBTQ people think they are sick or broken, and shame them out of being themselves.

Young people are often the target of these efforts.

With survivors of conversion therapy and thousands of activists like you we are calling on the government to end this horrific and harmful practice.

We’ve signed petitions and we’ve marched in rallies, now let’s come together as a community and make our voices heard. Amnesty International, Universal Studios and Palace Cinemas have joined forces to bring you a pre-release screening of Boy Erased, the new film by Joel Edgerton, starring Lucas Hedges, Nicole Kidman and Russell Crowe.

The film tells the story of Jared (Hedges), the son of a Baptist pastor in a small American town, who is outed to his parents (Kidman and Crowe) at age 19. Jared is faced with an ultimatum: attend a conversion therapy program – or be permanently exiled and shunned by his family, friends, and faith. Boy Erased is the true story of one young man’s struggle to find himself while being forced to question every aspect of his identity and is based on the memoir of Garrad Conley.

Join us on the 5 November from 6.45pm at the cinemas below to learn more about conversion therapy, work together to end the harmful practice, and watch Boy Erased.

Attendance is free, you just need to click on your city below and follow the instructions to RSVP. 

Content warning: the film contains scenes of sexual assault and violence which may be triggering to survivors.

Event details:

City Venue Room # Address
Canberra Palace Electric Cinema 3 2 Phillip Law St, Canberra
Sydney Palace Norton Street Cinema 3 99 Norton St, Leichhardt
Melbourne Palace Dendy Brighton Cinema 4 26 Church Street, Brighton
Brisbane Palace Barracks Cinema 1 61 Petrie Tce, Brisbane
Perth Palace Raine Square Cinema 6 Top Level, Raine Square, 300 Murray St, Perth
Adelaide Palace Nova TBC 3 Cinema Pl, Adelaide

Australia must suspend all military exports to Saudi Arabia over brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi

“The Australian Government’s response so far to Amnesty International’s concerns about arms sales to Saudi Arabia has amounted to blatantly brushing us off”
– Amnesty International Australia’s Crisis Campaigns Coordinator Diana Sayed

Responding to reports that Germany has suspended all future arms deals with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and ahead of the Defence Department appearing at Senate Estimates tomorrow, Amnesty International Australia’s Crisis Campaigns Coordinator Diana Sayed said,

“We welcome the Australian Government’s decision not to attend the economic forum ‘Davos in the Desert’ in Saudi Arabia this week in light of Washington Post columnist and journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s killing in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. However, the Australian Government must also suspend all arms transfers to Saudi Arabia.

“We have been calling on the Australian Government for some time now to publicly report the exact nature of all arms transfers to Saudi Arabia to date and to its allies in the war in Yemen, and to cease the authorisation of any future arms transfers while there remains a substantial risk these arms will be used to fuel human rights abuses.

“The Government’s response so far to our concerns about arms sales to Saudi Arabia has amounted to blatantly brushing us off.

“Amnesty International and others have documented endless laws, policies and individual cases in Saudi Arabia where the government and its officials have similarly flouted people’s right to life, equality, justice – and practically any other human right.

“Yet Australia chooses to wilfully ignore all of the human rights violations committed by Saudi Arabia and continue to expand military exports to the Kingdom – with 18 licenses approved to date.

“There is reluctance on the Government’s part to exercise transparency in its arms exports trade and this is incredibly worrying. It must cease all military exports to Saudi Arabia.

“We also urge Turkey to ask UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to establish a United Nations investigation into the possible extrajudicial execution of Jamal Khashoggi.”

Australia: Sanctions against Myanmar military welcome, but need expansion

Responding to Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne’s announcement today imposing targeted sanctions against five Myanmar military officers over their role in the ongoing ethnic cleansing campaign against the Rohingya people in northern Rakhine State, Amnesty International Australia’s Rohingya Rights Campaign Coordinator Diana Sayed said,

“The Australian Government has today responded to Amnesty International’s research and campaign calling for the imposition of sanctions on the key perpetrators of violence against the Rohingya people.

“The explosion of violence – including murder, rape, torture, burning and forced starvation – perpetrated by Myanmar’s security forces in villages across northern Rakhine State was not the action of rogue soldiers or units. There is a mountain of evidence that this was part of a highly orchestrated, systematic attack on the Rohingya population.

“The five men today sanctioned by Australia are among the 13 implicated in committing crimes against humanity and named in Amnesty International’s 27 June report ’We Will Destroy Everything’: Military Responsibility for Crimes against Humanity in Rakhine State, Myanmar.

“The Government must now expand its sanctions net to include all 13 named in that report, and push for comprehensive, multilateral sanctions in forums such as the United Nations Security Council and at the upcoming November ASEAN Summit.

“Only with a concerted international effort to impose a comprehensive arms embargo, and targeted financial sanctions against those individuals responsible for crimes against humanity, will justice be delivered for the Rohingya people.

“The Australian Government must also cut Australia’s training support to the Myanmar military. That Australian taxpayers’ money is going to support such human rights violators is unthinkable.

Background

Details of Amnesty International’s evidence against the military commanders responsible for crimes against humanity in Rakhine State, Myanmar, can be found here (summarised on page 155).

For example, one of the five sanctioned by the Australian Government, Lieutenant General Aung Kyaw Zaw, controlled all military operations in Western Command, which includes Rakhine State, and was charged with coordinating and controlling the use of air assets, including helicopters. During the post-25 August 2017 operations, logistical support via helicopter appears linked to the commission or cover-up of the 30 August massacre of Rohingya men, women and children in Min Gyi village, Maungdaw Township.

Lt. Gen. Aung Kyaw Zaw was physically present in northern Rakhine State during, at minimum, key periods before and during the 2017 operations marked by crimes against humanity against the Rohingya people. All of the elements of command or other superior responsibility appear to have been met.

Real bipartisan action urgently needed for all people in offshore detention

While discussions over the proposed ‘lifetime ban’ legislation and New Zealand deal must prioritise those most vulnerable – children and families – the negotiations must be a first step to moving the 1278 men, women and children from Australia’s abusive offshore detention regime, said Amnesty International today.

“All sides of Australian politics must agree to protect the children, women and men in immediate danger in the Manus Island and Nauru detention regimes,” said Tim O’Connor, Campaigns Manager at Amnesty International Australia.

An Iranian man on Manus Island is reportedly in a critical condition after being attacked on the weekend with a piece of wood, a day after another man on Manus reportedly self-harmed with a razor and attempted hanging. 52 children are still being held on Nauru, many suffering severe psychological conditions.

“The Bills before parliament, and the amendments being discussed, are a crisis measure. Restricting people’s freedom of movement, only because they are refugees, is a further denial of the human rights of people who have already survived horrific abuses.

“While we welcome the possibility of reprieve for these children and families, the fact is, no Bills need to be passed, or political stalemates negotiated, to move all people to safety.

“Refugees need and deserve protection and respect. The basic human right of every person to seek asylum from persecution is not diminished by their mode of arrival.

“Every day that Australian politicians spend discussing this or that legislation is another day of suffering for all people in offshore detention. The decision lies in the hands of Prime Minister Morrison: he could act this morning to move all children, women and men to Australia or to be settled in third-party countries,” said Tim O’Connor.

“We are willing to risk everything to defend our homes and land”

Tep Vanny is a Cambodian human rights defender who spent more than 700 days in prison for her peaceful activism. Her only “crime” was standing up against a luxury tourist construction project which resulted in the forced evictions of thousands of people out of their homes in the Boeung Kak lake area of Phnomh Penh. Now back at her home, Vanny tells Amnesty International what gave her hope during her imprisonment, and how she continues to fight for justice in her community.

Imagine having to campaign for the right to live in your own house. Imagine being arrested and imprisoned for that.

I spent two years and five days in prison. I missed my children, and my mother, who is elderly and sick. They needed me, and it was horrible to think that I couldn’t comfort them. I did not know how to live from one day to the next. The only way was to make myself busy with work, and I did a lot of knitting! It helped reduce my stress and stopped me thinking too much.

There was plenty to think about. Before development began on the Boeung Kak lake area there were 4,252 families here. 3,000 have already been removed from the area to make way for a luxury development, houses have been bulldozed and there is nothing left of the lake. The remaining families need land titles to stay, but the government has only given these to 676 families so far.

The people in the Boeung Kak area first started protesting in 2007 – I only started participating in 2010. The numbers gradually grew as people started to understand that we were fighting for our children’s futures. We protested every day. There were many arrests and imprisonments. I have been jailed four times, and arrested at least 10 times, and the same has happened to others in my community. We still have not given up protesting, because we are willing to risk everything to defend our homes and land.

Since being released from prison, looking after my family has been my priority. But I am also carrying on my fight to end the land disputes in Boeung Kak. At the moment I am focusing on two families, and have asked the government to intervene by giving them land titles. These families have suffered for a long time in Boeung Kak — more than 10 years of suffering and uncertainty about the future.

I still worry about my safety and that of my family. I feel unsafe even though I am free.

Government spies continue to follow me, and some nights there have been violent Daun Penh district [an area in Phnom Penh] security guards driving back and forth on motorbikes taking pictures of me.

I want the world to know about these issues. The campaign to release me and other activists was so important, not only because it gave us strength but because it shone a light on the injustices we were fighting against. The Cambodian authorities would prefer these injustices to happen in the dark.

I want the evictions to stop, and I want to be able to live here in safety and freedom. I want the government to care about our human rights as much as they care about making money from developments.

I am really proud of what I have been able to do for the Boeung Kak community.

I was just an ordinary housewife, an ordinary person with a limited education and limited knowledge of social issues and the world. We got solutions for almost everyone. This is what I am proud of, even though I have been jailed.

When we face problems and we lose hope, we become weak and can give up what we are struggling for. So, I want people to not feel hopeless. We are innocent people who do not do illegal things. I think this means that success is waiting for us in the future – if we are prepared to struggle to reach our destination.

I never thought I’d be here, at home, talking to Amnesty International and surrounded by my family and community. Just being able to go in and out of our house freely and walk freely outside is a novelty.

I hold out my hand to thank those who have campaigned to get me free and to allow me to reunite with my children and parents. You comforted me and stopped me from feeling alone. I appreciate your kindness and your work to improve human rights around the world.

This story was originally published on Thomson Reuters Foundation. 

Gaza: Fears of further bloodshed as Israel adopts ‘zero tolerance’ policy

Fears of escalating bloodshed are rising ahead of planned protests in Gaza later today after Israeli authorities announced a “zero tolerance” policy towards demonstrations along the Israel/Gaza fence, said Amnesty International.

The organisation is calling on the Israeli government to rein in its armed forces, which have routinely used unnecessary or excessive force during Gaza’s weekly “Great March of Return” demonstrations.

“Given Israeli forces’ horrific track record of using deadly force against Palestinian demonstrators in Gaza, as well as journalists, medics and others, the announcement of a ‘zero tolerance’ policy is deeply alarming,” said Saleh Higazi, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

The exact details of what “zero tolerance” means have not been disclosed, but there are fears it will lead to more Palestinian deaths along the Gaza/Israel border.

“There are serious fears that this policy will further sanction the use of deadly force against unarmed protesters during today’s demonstrations, and that Israeli forces will be given carte blanche authorisation to carry out large-scale, unlawful killings escalating the bloodshed. Israel has repeatedly used lethal force unnecessarily and excessively against unarmed protesters in shameless violation of international law,” said Saleh Higazi.

Protesters are due to gather today for “Great March of Return” protests, which have taken place every Friday since 30 March demanding the lifting of the 11-year unlawful blockade on Gaza and the return of Palestinian refugees to their villages and towns.

“Given Israeli forces’ horrific track record of using deadly force against Palestinian demonstrators in Gaza, as well as journalists, medics and others, the announcement of a ‘zero tolerance’ policy is deeply alarming” – Saleh Higazi, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International

Since the protests began, more than 150 Palestinians have been killed, including more than 30 children, and thousands of others have been injured.

The new Israeli government policy announcement came on Thursday 18 October after the Israeli security cabinet met in Jerusalem to discuss their response to a rocket from Gaza that hit and damaged a residential home in Beersheba in southern Israel. Amnesty International has consistently condemned attacks by Palestinian armed groups on civilians and civilian objects. According to Israeli media reports, Palestinian demonstrators will have to remain farther away from the border fence, otherwise soldiers will open fire. Israeli authorities have also stated that incendiary balloons and kites launched from Gaza will be met with greater force.

Israel’s Housing Minister and former Commander of the Israeli army’s Southern Command, Yoav Gallant, was quoted in Israeli media stating that “the rules of the game are about to change”, hinting that Israel will be stepping up its response against armed groups in the Gaza strip and raising fears of full-scale military action.

“The three armed conflicts between Israel and Hamas have had catastrophic consequences for the population of Gaza, which continues to suffer from 11 years of living under a brutal blockade,” said Saleh Higazi.

“It is now time the international community shows ‘zero tolerance’ towards Israel’s flagrant contempt for Palestinian lives and disregard for its obligations under international law.”

Khashoggi: Turkey must seek UN Inquiry, Saudi-Turkish Cooperation Essential to Credibility

Turkey should urgently ask UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to establish a United Nations investigation into the possible extrajudicial execution of the prominent Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the Committee to Protect Journalists, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Reporters Without Borders say.

The investigation should determine the circumstances surrounding Saudi Arabia’s role in the enforced disappearance and possible killing of Khashoggi. It should aim to identify everyone responsible for ordering, planning, and executing any operations connected with the case.

“Turkey should enlist the UN to initiate a timely, credible, and transparent investigation,” said Robert Mahoney, deputy executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists. “UN involvement is the best guarantee against a Saudi whitewash or attempts by other governments to sweep the issue under the carpet to preserve lucrative business ties with Riyadh.”

Evidence collected by the UN investigation team should be preserved for use in future prosecutions. The investigation team should have complete access to travel where it needs to and to interview potential witnesses or suspects without interference. The team should also recommend avenues for bringing to justice anyone against whom credible and admissible evidence of involvement is found.

Khashoggi entered the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2, 2018 and has not been seen or heard from since. Saudi Arabia has denied involvement in Khashoggi’s disappearance, claiming he left the consulate on his own shortly after his arrival, but it has failed to produce any evidence supporting this claim.

Saudi authorities have escalated their crackdown on dissenting voices in the country since Mohammad bin Salman became crown prince in June 2017, marked by systematic repression of dissent, including peaceful expression directed to the promotion and protection of human rights. Virtually all human rights defenders and critical voices, including religious clerics, journalists, and academics, have been targeted in the recent arrests.

Khashoggi’s disappearance comes after more than a year of arrests targeting journalists who reported on corruption, women’s rights, and other sensitive issues. Several are being held in unknown locations, without charges,according to research by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Many individuals, including the prominent women human rights defenders Loujain al-Hathloul, Iman al-Nafjan, and Aziza al-Yousef, have been arbitrarily detained without charge for months. These women activists and many others may face lengthy prison terms or the death penalty following grossly unfair trials before the counterterrorism court for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, or assembly.

The Turkish authorities announced that they had initiated a criminal investigation on the day of Khashoggi’s disappearance on October 2. As part of this investigation, they conducted a forensic examination of the Saudi Arabian consulate on October 15. Information from the investigation has been shared with the media through a series of leaks, including claims regarding the existence of audio and visual records proving that Khashoggi was murdered in the consulate.

“If the government of Saudi Arabia is not involved in Jamal Khashoggi’s fate, it has the most to gain in seeing an impartial UN investigation determine what happened. Without a credible UN inquiry, there will always be a cloud of suspicion hanging over Saudi Arabia, no matter what its leadership says to explain away how Khashoggi vanished.” – Sherine Tadros, Head of the New York office of Amnesty International

On October 15, Saudi Arabia’s king ordered the Public Prosecution to open an investigation into Khashoggi’s disappearance. Given the possible involvement of Saudi authorities in Khashoggi’s enforced disappearance and possible murder, and the lack of independence of Saudi Arabia’s criminal justice system, the impartiality of any investigation by the Saudi authorities would be in question.  

Khashoggi’s fiancé, Hatice Cengiz, a Turkish national, told media outlets that when Khashoggi entered the Saudi consulate on October 2 to obtain their marriage documents, he left her his phones and instructions to alert the Turkish authorities if he did not return after two hours. That was the last time Cengiz saw him. Turkish authorities believe Khashoggi was killed and dismembered by Saudi agents inside the consulate.

“This demonstrates all the more clearly how imperative an impartial and independent investigation is in order to establish the truth and ensure justice for Jamal Khashoggi,” said Christophe Deloire, secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders. “If the UN is truly mobilised to fight impunity for crimes against journalists, then at the very least they must be fully engaged in one of the most shocking and extreme cases in recent years by undertaking this investigation.”

There is a precedent for such a UN investigation. In 2008, Pakistan asked then Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to establish an investigation into the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. That investigation uncovered what investigators said was an attempt by Pakistani authorities to whitewash the events surrounding Bhutto’s murder.

An investigation into Khashoggi’s enforced disappearance and possible murder should start promptly and be thorough, impartial, and independent. UN Secretary-General Guterres should appoint a senior criminal investigator with extensive experience in international investigations to head the team. Once the investigation is concluded, the secretary-general should issue a public report on the overall findings along with his recommendations for following up.

“Jamal Khashoggi’s family and the rest of the world deserve the full truth about what happened to him,” said Louis Charbonneau, UN director at Human Rights Watch. “Partial explanations and one-sided investigations by Saudi Arabia, which is suspected of involvement, aren’t good enough. Only the UN has the credibility and independence required to expose the masterminds behind Khashoggi’s enforced disappearance and to hold them to account.”

Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and all other UN member countries should fully cooperate with the UN investigation to ensure that it has all the access and support necessary to determine what happened to Khashoggi. To facilitate the investigation, Saudi Arabia should immediately waive diplomatic protections such as the inviolability or immunity of all relevant premises and officials bestowed by treaties such as the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Michelle Bachelet, the UN high commissioner for human rights, has called for waiving these diplomatic protections in the case.

Turkey should turn over all evidence, including audio and visual records that Turkish officials have repeatedly claimed to the media reveal Khashoggi’s murder in the Saudi consulate. A newly formed Turkish-Saudi working group investigating the murder will be unable to make progress in the face of Saudi Arabia’s blanket denials and rejection of any involvement in Khashoggi’s enforced disappearance.

“If the government of Saudi Arabia is not involved in Jamal Khashoggi’s fate, it has the most to gain in seeing an impartial UN investigation determine what happened,” said Sherine Tadros, head of the New York office of Amnesty International. “Without a credible UN inquiry, there will always be a cloud of suspicion hanging over Saudi Arabia, no matter what its leadership says to explain away how Khashoggi vanished.”

Jamal Khashoggi is a prominent Saudi journalist with several Saudi Arabia-based Arabic and English-language newspapers including Okaz and the Saudi Gazette, and he served two stints as the editor-in-chief of the Saudi daily al-Watan. In December 2016, Saudi authorities publicly denounced Khashoggi after he criticised then US President-Elect Donald Trump at an event in Washington, and he fled Saudi Arabia to the United States in June 2017, becoming a regular columnist for the Washington Post.

How to talk about human rights with anyone

By Sam Hagaman, Communications Coordinator, Amnesty International Australia

We’ve all had difficult – and let’s face it,  awkward – conversations with people about things we care about. But how do we handle it when someone disagrees with us?

In the past, my solution was simple: I’d ‘logic’ them over to my way of thinking. Counter their words with facts – because no one could possibly argue with cold, hard facts, right? (Unfortunately they can…and do!)

The result? I have ‘agreed to disagree’ with racist cab drivers. I’ve found myself deep into the refugee crisis with pub pundits who didn’t realise what they were in for. I’ve been accused of pretentiousness and hypocrisy when championing a free-range meat selection at the supermarket.

I’ve learnt the hard way: facts don’t sway people.

But all is not lost. Amnesty’s amazing volunteers and activists routinely mobilise ordinary people in their communities to take action on a wide range of human rights issues. They use a common conversational approach, following the principles of ‘explore, equalise and elevate’.

Find out how you can use those very same principles when talking about human rights with anyone, even your nan, old school friends and chatty cab drivers.

Explore

People like to feel listened to, valued and understood. If they don’t, it’s very easy for them to put up a brick wall, even if they might have initially been persuaded to think differently. Try saying things like:

“Tell me more about that…”

“What led you to feel that way?”

I’d like to understand more about where you’re coming from.”

Sometimes the first thing people say isn’t the real reason why they are opposed; it’s something a bit deeper that takes more questions to understand.

Equalise

Acknowledge the feelings of the person you’re talking to and make them feel heard. You don’t always have to agree but showing someone that you’ve taken on board their opinion could make a big difference to the way they respond to you. You could say things like:

“I understand where you’re coming from…”

“I can see why you’d feel that way…”

When we’re told that we’re wrong, most of us dig our heels in even more. It’s why some of my conversations have escalated way past my general sanguine state of being. I mean, who hasn’t lost their cool when trying to convince someone that human rights/animal rights/the environment is important/under threat/completely effed? (If you haven’t, you’re a god among mere mortals!)

Elevate

This is the part of the conversation when you get to casually throw in some new ways of thinking about an issue and target human values that most people feel strongly about.

Try not to shower them with facts – facts don’t convince people and can often lead to views becoming more entrenched. At Amnesty, time and again, we’ve seen the power of demonstrating values and telling stories in changing opinions. Showing the human face of an issue helps people to empathise in a way that explaining the facts of a situation just can’t.

A good example of this in practice is the conversation around refugees and asylum seekers in Australia. If you’re talking to a person who believes offshore processing is necessary because it prevents deaths at sea, you could try saying:

I agree that concern for peoples’ wellbeing should come first. How do you feel about kids being in detention? For me, I wonder if taking away a person’s childhood is ever okay?

Surely, being caring people, it’s on us to reach out a helping hand to other people when they need it. We are all people, after all, and we need to care for each other. What do you think?

Ultimately, use your judgement. But try not to ‘negate’ the other person’s logic. Every time you feel like rebuffing them by saying they’re not right, stop and rethink your approach.

Instead of saying:

Offshore processing does not stop boats. It does not save lives, in fact, it puts them in danger.

Try:

We are caring people, and I think we should find new ways to welcome people here and make sure they are safe.

You won’t always succeed

Changing someone’s opinion is incredibly difficult. Some even say it’s extremely rare. You won’t win every battle and you won’t win every person over to your way of thinking. But following these steps will give you a fighting chance.

Have any other conversation tips? Let us know in the comments below.

PM Morrison must act now to stop escalating Nauru crisis

With the critical situation on Nauru deteriorating even further, Amnesty International is calling on the Australian Government to show leadership and urgently bring all refugees and asylum seekers to Australia, or a safe third country.

Dr Graham Thom, Amnesty International Australia’s Refugee Coordinator, said, “The Australian Chief Medical Officer has reportedly been deported, which will only compound the dire health situation for people on Nauru, including the more than 80 children who have suffered for over five years.

“Continuity of care is crucial for such a large number of refugees, including children with such complex health needs, but that’s clearly impossible in such a volatile situation.

“These children desperately need our help. Prime Minister Morrison cannot stall any longer with his calls for so-called ‘back-door’ legislation, especially as the New Zealand Government reiterated its concern only yesterday that such legislation would create ‘second-class citizens’.

“PM Scott Morrison has the power to bring these children and their families to safety in Australia today, and avert a possible catastrophe, such as the death of a child.”

The Australian Medical Association, which gathered the support of almost 6,000 doctors this week, has said, “[children] need to be assessed and treated as a matter of urgency. It’s a miracle we haven’t had a death already.”

Dr Thom said, “Several recent deportations by the Nauruan Government have had a detrimental impact on refugees and asylum seekers and their right to adequate health care. It has stopped Médecins Sans Frontières from providing vital mental health support, and moved to deport another Australian Chief Medical Officer just a month after sending home the former position holder. Refugees and asylum seekers with high health needs, including children, are obviously not being put at the forefront of decision making.

“The time to act is now, and we call on the Australian Government and our Prime Minister to provide the leadership our country, and its values, demand.”

Mother Mushroom: Vietnamese blogger released and exiled

Nguyễn Ngọc Như Quỳnh, a prominent Vietnamese blogger also known by her pseudonym, Mẹ Nấm (Mother Mushroom), has been released from prison in Vietnam on the condition that she leaves the country.

The mother of two was arrested in 2016 and sentenced to 10 years in prison on charges of “conducting propaganda” against the state.

Responding to news of the release, Nicholas Bequelin, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and South East Asia, said:

“This good news, which comes as a relief after two years behind bars, should also be a reminder of Vietnam’s worsening record of jailing anyone who criticises the regime. While Mother Mushroom is no longer imprisoned, the condition for her release was exile and there are over one hundred people languishing in jail because they peacefully spoke their mind – in public, on blogs or on Facebook.

“The mobilisation around the world for Mother Mushroom’s case should trigger a change of course for Vietnam’s leaders. The Cybersecurity Law due to take effect in January 2019 will only give authorities more tools to silence dissent and put people away. It should not be implemented – lest others face the same horrific treatment as Mother Mushroom and other peaceful critics still in jail. All prisoners of conscience should have their sentences quashed and should be released immediately and unconditionally.”

Arrest and sentencing

Nguyễn Ngọc Như Quỳnh was arrested on 10 October 2016 and held incommunicado until 20 June 2017. On 29 June 2017, she was handed a 10-year prison sentence, having been convicted of “conducting propaganda against the State of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam” under Article 88 of Vietnam’s Penal Code.

Silencing dissenters

Nguyễn Ngọc Như Quỳnh co-founded the independent Vietnamese Bloggers Network in December 2013. She has on numerous occasions faced harassment, arrest and interrogation for her peaceful activities, and has been prevented from travelling overseas. 

Vietnam is stepping up its crackdown on dissent, with dozens of activists and bloggers put on trial for national security law-related offenses. There are more than 100 peaceful human rights defenders and activists in Vietnamese prisons who have been arbitrarily arrested and convicted for exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.