Wanted for mass murder: posters target Myanmar’s top general

“Wanted” posters of Min Aung Hlaing, the Commander-in-Chief of the Myanmar military who oversaw atrocities against the country’s Rohingya population, have been posted around New York, as part of our campaign for accountability in Myanmar.

World leaders, including representatives from Myanmar’s government, are meeting in New York this week for the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA).

Accountability for the atrocities committed against the Rohingya and Myanmar’s other ethnic minorities is expected to be high on the agenda. The UN Human Rights Council is currently discussing the establishment of an evidence-preservation mechanism which could see Min Aung Hlaing and other suspected perpetrators come closer to prosecution.

Amnesty International’s posters have been plastered on sidewalks in 30 locations around the city, including iconic landmarks.

“Senior General Min Aung Hlaing is responsible for overseeing crimes against humanity in Myanmar. He was top of the chain of command during the Myanmar army’s vicious campaign of murder, rape, torture and village burning which forced hundreds of thousands from their homes,” said Kumi Naidoo, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

“Senior General Min Aung Hlaing is responsible for overseeing crimes against humanity in Myanmar. He was top of the chain of command during the Myanmar army’s vicious campaign of murder, rape, torture and village burning which forced hundreds of thousands from their homes” – Kumi Naidoo, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

“His army has also committed war crimes against ethnic minority civilians in northern Myanmar, where conflicts continue to rage. We want world leaders to have his face in their minds this week when they discuss next steps for accountability.

“For too long Min Aung Hlaing has managed to stay out of the spotlight and escape international attention, despite overseeing the horrendous crimes against the Rohingya. It’s time to expose those responsible for these atrocities, and make sure they are held to account.”

The posters put up around New York overnightread: “Wanted for mass murder – Don’t let him get away with it”, and also include harrowing quotes from Rohingya survivors.

“I heard the baby cry, then they shot, then nothing,” one Rohingya woman, 45, said. She was referring to her seven-month-old granddaughter who was murdered by soldiers in August 2017.

More than 80 per cent of northern Rakhine State’s Rohingya population have fled to neighbouring Bangladesh to seek safety since military operations began on 25 August 2017.

Command responsibility

Amnesty International’s research shows that many of the crimes committed against Rohingya women, men and children were planned and orchestrated at the highest levels in the Myanmar military. At the very least, the Myanmar military’s command structure means it is inconceivable that Min Aung Hlaing and other senior military officials would not have been aware of what was happening on the ground in northern Rakhine State, yet they failed to take action to prevent or stop the crimes, or to punish those responsible.

In fact, top military commanders, including Min Aung Hlaing, travelled to the region before or during the ethnic cleansing campaign to oversee parts of the operation and documented their visits in Facebook posts.

Wanted poster of Myanmar's top military general, Min Aung Hlaing, on a billboard in New York. Backdrop of iconic New York skyscrapers.
On the first day of the UN General Assembly, 24th September 2018, Amnesty posted “wanted” posters of Min Aung Hlaing, Myanmar’s top general, around New York © Amnesty International

 

Amnesty International also identified specific military units operating under the direct command of the Senior General’s War Office which were on the ground in northern Rakhine State from August 2017 and responsible for many of the appalling abuses against the Rohingya. Amnesty International has also implicated these same units in war crimes and other human rights violations against ethnic minority civilians in Kachin and Shan States in northern Myanmar.

Amnesty International is calling for the UN Security Council to refer the situation in Myanmar to the International Criminal Court without delay.

“World leaders must commit Min Aung Hlaing’s face to memory,” said Kumi Naidoo.

“He and his fellow commanders were in command of forces that committed shocking crimes under international law – it’s time they faced justice.”

Seven athletes standing up for what they believe in

In September 2000, Cathy Freeman sprinted to victory in front of a home crowd at the Sydney Olympics.

The image of Freeman running her victory lap carrying the Australian and Aboriginal flags remains in Australia’s collective mindset.

Over the years, a number of high profile athletes from around the world have spoken up for what they believe in. Here are seven iconic moments in history (in no particular order) in which sport and human rights walked together hand-in-hand.

1. Cathy Freeman

Cathy Freeman has long been a symbol of hope and reconciliation for Australia. In an iconic moment for Australian sports, Freeman took home the gold medal in the 400-metre race at the 2000 Sydney Olympics. The image of her running barefoot and proud, flying both the Australian and Aboriginal flags, united the country – if only for a brief moment.

“It was always a dream of mine to not only win an Olympic gold medal but to do the victory lap with both flags,” Freeman said in a documentary about the Sydney Olympics.

“I hold the Aboriginal community in such a high place in my heart so I’m very proud of my Indigenous roots.”

Cathy Freeman, olympic gold medalist

The former Australian sprinter had previously caused controversy by carrying both flags during her victory lap after winning the 200-metre sprint at the Commonwealth Games in 1994.

In 1995, Prime Minister Paul Keating officially made the Aboriginal flag a national flag, and it now sits proudly alongside the Australian National flag.

In 2007, Freeman founded the Cathy Freeman Foundation which works with remote Indigenous communities to close the gap in education between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in Australia.

2. Colin Kaepernick

Two men dressed in the red and yellow team strip of the San Francisco 49ers kneel in protest during the singing of the American national anthem before a football game. Behind them their team mates are standing and in the ba
Colin Kaepernick (right) of the San Francisco 49ers is joined by teammate Eric Reid (left) in kneeling in protest during the American national anthem prior to playing the Los Angeles Rams in their NFL game at Levi’s Stadium on 12 September, 2016 in Santa Clara, California © Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

During the 2016 pre-season of the American National Football League, Colin Kaepernick knelt during the US national anthem, as a respectful way of calling on his country to protect and uphold the rights of all its people. The bold move was a response to the disproportionate numbers of black people being killed by police. It sparked a movement that follows a long tradition of non-violent protests that made history in the United States.

While the polarised response to the “take-a-knee” protest ignited a debate about free speech and the right to protest, Colin Kaepernick remained focused on highlighting the injustices that moved him to act. His charity, the Colin Kaepernick Foundation, works to fight oppression around the world through education and social activism, including through free “Know Your Rights” camps which educate and empower young people.

For his courage, Colin Kaepernick was awarded the Amnesty International Ambassador of Conscience Award in 2018.

3. Billie Jean King

Tennis players Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs in 1973
Tennis players Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs in 1973 © Private

In 1973, an infamous tennis match known as the “Battle of the Sexes” between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs changed the future of women’s tennis forever. Bobby Riggs was a former Wimbledon champion known to be a notorious chauvinist, and Billie Jean King’s victory in the match was an emblematic milestone on the road to gender equality in sports.

In the 45 years since that extraordinary match, Billie Jean King has jeopardised her tennis career on numerous occasions to speak out for both women’s equality and LGBTQI rights.

During the 1960s and 70s, King spoke out for better pay for women tennis players, who earned significantly less than male players. Joining eight other women tennis players, Billie Jean signed a $1 contract and joined the Virginia Slims Circuit founded by Gladys Heldman in 1970 to protest against the inequity in prize money. This group of brave women, known as the “Original 9,” backed Billie Jean as she formed the Women’s Tennis Association and became its first President.

In 2009, former US President Barack Obama awarded Billie Jean King the Presidential Medal of Freedom for her advocacy work on behalf of women and the LGBTQI community.

4. Muhammad Ali

Muhammad Ali vs. Ernie Terrell, Houston Astrodome, Houston, TX, 1967
Muhammad Ali vs. Ernie Terrell, Houston Astrodome, Houston, TX, 1967 © Cliff/Flickr

In 1967, the former American professional boxer refused to fight in the Vietnam War, citing his conscience and personal convictions in rejecting the call to be drafted.

His courage to stand up for his beliefs led to a five-year prison sentence (although no time was served), a $10,000 fine, the seizing of his passport, a ban from fighting in the US and the stripping of his heavyweight title. He returned to boxing in 1970 and his conviction was reversed in 1971.

5, 6 and 7. Tommie Smith, John Carlos and Peter Norman

Tommie Smith, John Carlos and Peter Norman at the Olympic Games in Mexico City in 1968 © Ur Cameras/Flickr

In an act that scandalised the 1968 Mexico Olympics, African-American athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos made a silent protest heard around the world. Protesting racial discrimination against black people in the United States, the pair stood on the medal podium with their heads bowed and a fist raised in the Black Power salute to the tune of the American National Anthem.

Both men were sent home in disgrace and banned from the Olympics for life, but were lauded as heroes by many.

Incidentally, Peter Norman, an Australian sprinter from Melbourne who took silver that year and stood on the podium with Smith and Carlos, supported the plan to protest. He wore a small Olympic Project for Human Rights badge. His support did not go down well in Australia and never ran in the Olympics again. However, the three remained lifelong friends, with Smith and Carlos acting as pallbearers at Norman’s funeral in 2006.

There are so many brave and politically-conscious athletes, too many to name in a single blog post, so feel free to add yours to the comments in the field below. Who did we miss?

United Nations: Torture is big business, although outlawed internationally

Companies all over the world are still profiting from the sale of gruesome torture equipment such as spiked batons, stun belts and leg irons, Amnesty International said today, as it called on world leaders to join the Global Alliance for Torture-Free Trade, a landmark agreement launched in 2017.

The Global Alliance’s 58 member states have committed to controlling and restricting exports of goods which can be used for torture or other ill-treatment. Amnesty International’s Secretary General Kumi Naidoo will later today address the first ministerial meeting of the Global Alliance at the UN headquarters in New York

“It’s been decades since torture and other ill-treatment was outlawed internationally, so why is equipment that is designed solely to inflict pain and fear still being traded around the world? Loose regulations mean that companies are still profiting from the sale of horrible tools like spiked batons and stun cuffs. It’s simple – as long as this equipment is on the market, it will be used by torturers,” said Ara Marcen Naval, Advocate for Arms Control and Human Rights at Amnesty International.

“Creating the Global Alliance was a major achievement for anti-torture campaigners, and we are calling on more states to join this week. Banning torture and other ill-treatment but turning a blind eye to the tools used to carry them out is not good enough. States must come together to finish the job and put a stop to this sinister trade for good.”

Amnesty International has been a key voice advising on regional and international regulations to combat the trade in tools of torture. Together with the Omega Research Foundation, the organisation released a briefing today setting out recommendations.

“Banning torture and other ill-treatment but turning a blind eye to the tools used to carry them out is not good enough. States must come together to finish the job and put a stop to this sinister trade for good” – Ara Marcen Naval, Advocate for Arms Control and Human Rights at Amnesty International

Amnesty International and its partner Omega Research Foundation believe that in order to be fully effective, any legislation aiming to tackle this trade should have a two-pronged approach. It should ban inherently abusive equipment, while regulating equipment which may have a legitimate purpose but which is commonly abused for torture or other ill-treatment.

Amnesty International is calling for an absolute ban on inherently abusive law enforcement equipment, which covers items such as neck restraints, weighted or spiked batons, stun gloves and body-worn electric shock devices. However there also needs to be much more stringent controls on equipment that may have a legitimate use, but which can easily be misused. This includes restraint devices, riot control agents such as tear gas, and standard striking weapons like truncheons and batons.

Amnesty International has repeatedly documented how common law-enforcement equipment can be used to torture or otherwise ill-treat people. For example, countries including Israel, Bahrain, Turkey and Colombia have used tear gas against peaceful protesters in an excessive and abusive manner, often causing serious injury.

Amnesty International is calling on states to assess the risks before granting authorisations of these types of equipment, in line with other trade-control regimes of dangerous goods, such as conventional arms.

“Law-enforcement weapons and devices should never be supplied to recipients who are likely to use them for torture, other ill-treatment or other serious human rights violations,” said Ara Marcen Navel.

“We are urging the Global Alliance and its member states to commit to regulating equipment that could be used to torture or ill-treat people. This includes immediately establishing international standards to make it harder for companies to export such tools.”

China: Families of up to one million detained in mass ‘re-education’ drive demand answers

  • An estimated up to one million predominantly Muslim people are held in internment camps in Xinjiang in northwest China
  • Families tell Amnesty of their desperation for news on missing loved ones

China must end its campaign of systematic repression and shed light on the fate of up to one million predominantly Muslim people arbitrarily detained in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR), Amnesty International said in a new briefing.

The past year has seen an intensifying government campaign of mass internment, intrusive surveillance, political indoctrination and forced cultural assimilation against the region’s Uighurs, Kazakhs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups. Most of the detainees’ families have been kept in the dark about their loved ones’ fate and are often too frightened to speak out.

“The Chinese government must not be allowed to continue this vicious campaign against ethnic minorities in northwest China. Governments across the world must hold the Chinese authorities to account for the nightmare unfolding in the XUAR,” said Nicholas Bequelin, Amnesty International’s East Asia Director.

“Families have suffered enough. Hundreds of thousands of families have been torn apart by this massive crackdown. They are desperate to know what has happened to their loved ones and it is time the Chinese authorities give them answers.”

“Hundreds of thousands of families have been torn apart by this massive crackdown. They are desperate to know what has happened to their loved ones”– Nicholas Bequelin, Amnesty International’s East Asia Director

In a new briefing, China: Where are they? Time for answers about mass detentions in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, Amnesty International highlights the anguish of people who have lost touch with relatives and friends inside the XUAR and who fear they have been detained.

The organisation interviewed more than 100 people outside of China whose relatives in XUAR are still missing, as well as individuals who were tortured while in detention camps there.

Mass detention

The internment of predominantly Muslim ethnic groups in the XUAR has intensified since March 2017, when a “Regulation on De-extremification” was adopted in the region. Open or even private displays of religious and cultural affiliation, including growing an “abnormal” beard, wearing a veil or headscarf, regular prayer, fasting or avoidance of alcohol, or possessing books or articles about Islam or Uighur culture can be considered “extremist” under the regulation.

Travel abroad for work or education, particularly to majority Muslim countries, or contact with people outside China are also major reasons for suspicion. Male, female; young, old; urban, rural, all are at risk of being detained.

The ubiquitous security checks that are now a routine part of daily life for all in the XUAR provide ample opportunity to search mobile phones for suspicious content or check people’s identities using facial recognition software.

Individuals might come under suspicion through routine monitoring of messages sent on social media apps like WeChat, which does not use end-to-end encryption. Use of alternative messaging apps with encryption, such as WhatsApp, can also be a cause for detention.

The authorities label the camps as centres for “transformation-through-education”, but many simply call them “re-education camps”. Those sent to detention camps are not put on trial, have no access to lawyers or right to challenge the decision.

The authorities label the camps as centres for “transformation-through-education”, but many simply call them “re-education camps”. Those sent to detention camps are not put on trial, have no access to lawyers or right to challenge the decision. Individuals could be left to languish in detention for months, as it is the authorities who decide when an individual has been “transformed”.

Kairat Samarkan was sent to a detention camp in October 2017, after he returned to the XUAR following a short visit to neighbouring Kazakhstan. Police told him he was detained because he was accused of having dual citizenship and had betrayed his country. He was released in February 2018.

Kairat told Amnesty that he was hooded, made to wear shackles on his arms and legs and was forced to stand in a fixed position for 12 hours when first detained. There were nearly 6,000 people held in the same camp, where they were forced to sing political songs and study speeches of the Chinese Communist Party. They could not talk to each other and were forced to chant “Long live Xi Jinping” before meals. Kairat told Amnesty that his treatment drove him to attempt suicide just before his release.

Those who resist or fail to show enough progress reportedly face punishments ranging from verbal abuse to food deprivation, solitary confinement, beatings and use of restraints and stress positions. There have been reports of deaths inside the facilities, including suicides of those unable to bear the mistreatment.

The authorities justify the extreme measures as necessary for counter terrorism purposes and to ensure national security. However, measures to protect citizens from attacks must be necessary and proportionate and as narrow and targeted as possible to address a specific threat.

“The mass detention camps are places of brainwashing, torture and punishment. A simple act of messaging your family abroad can get you detained highlights how ludicrous, unjustified and completely arbitrary the Chinese authorities’ actions are,” said Nicholas Bequelin.

Families torn apart

For months, relatives of the missing kept their anguish to themselves. They hoped the loss of contact with loved ones back home would be temporary. They feared making things worse if they sought outside help. Now, with no clear end in sight for their torment, more and more are willing to speak up.

Bota Kussaiyn, an ethnic Kazakh student studying at Moscow State University, last spoke with her father, Kussaiyn Sagymbai, over WeChat in November 2017. Originally from the XUAR, their family had re-settled in Kazakhstan in 2013.

Bota’s father had returned to China in late 2017 to see a doctor, but the authorities confiscated his passport after he arrived in the XUAR. Bota subsequently learnt from relatives there that her father had been sent to a “re-education camp”.

Her relatives in the XUAR were so afraid that further contact might put them under suspicion that they stopped communicating with her after that.

To avoid arousing such suspicion, Uighurs, Kazakhs and others inside the XUAR have reportedly been cutting all ties with friends and family living outside China.

Bota told Amnesty: “My father is an ordinary citizen. We were a happy family before he was detained. We laughed together. We can’t laugh any more, and we can’t sleep at night. We live in fear every day. It has done great harm to my mother. We don’t know where he is. We don’t even know if he’s still alive. I want to see my father again.”

Many relatives and friends abroad report feelings of guilt, because it seems to be precisely these overseas connections that in many cases are causing their loved ones in the XUAR to fall under suspicion. The authorities accuse them of having ties to outside groups the Chinese government alleges promote “extremist” religious views or plot “terrorist activity”.

To avoid arousing such suspicion, Uighurs, Kazakhs and others inside the XUAR have reportedly been cutting all ties with friends and family living outside China. They warn acquaintances not to call and delete outside contacts from social media applications. Unable to get reliable information from home, many living abroad inevitably fear the worst.

When parents are taken away, children are left to suffer, with many families experiencing economic hardship. Older children might be sent to state-run vocational training centres, while younger ones can wind up in one of the massive “welfare centres” that have been constructed since 2017.

Spying

Adding to the pressure on those living abroad are aggressive efforts by Chinese security officials to recruit spies in overseas communities. Those targeted are reportedly threatened that if they do not cooperate, family members back in the XUAR will be detained. If they do cooperate, on the other hand, they receive promises that their loved ones will be treated leniently.

Not knowing who among the community living overseas might be reporting back to security authorities in China plants seeds of suspicion and distrust that take root and further feed the sense of isolation and fear.

“The Chinese authorities’ systematic campaign of suppression is having a devastating toll on the lives of millions of people. It’s time the authorities come clean about the camps and let families be reunited,” said Nicholas Bequelin.

Introducing the new activist Refugee campaign leads

The My New neighbour campaign is a grassroots campaign driven by an organising strategy that relies on people taking the power back and leading the change from within their own communities. To do this we need activists ready and willing to get out and take the campaign to their neighbours, their workplace, their sporting clubs and ultimately their councils. By driving this community-led solution we can demonstrate to our political leaders the need for alternative solutions and pathways for refugees.

So, how are we going to achieve this vision?

In come a group of experienced activists ready and willing to champion and lead the campaign in their state. Claire Birch in Western Australia, Margherita Mezzasoma in Victoria, Jill Thomsen in the Australian Capital Territory,  Elijah Winters in South Australia, Rebecca Buttenshaw in Queensland and Kathleen Herbert and Marco Stojanovik in New South Wales.

These activist campaign leads have been working with their community organiser for the last couple of months to draft regional plans and have spent last weekend coming together in Sydney to finesse them. They have spent this weekend developing a solid understanding of the campaign strategy and how to roll it out in your region. How to map targets and how to influence them. How to champion media and make it central and embedded in My New Neighbour work and how to use mobilisation tools and understand how different tools and tactics can reach and influence different audiences. Now they are ready to come back to your regions and work with all of you working on the campaign to make sure we can have the success we want and need to see, to build the spirit of welcome for refugees.

Here’s some of what they had to say:

“This face to face has been so great, it has been such a fantastic opportunity to meet everyone and know that we have shared vision and common goals and the support to bring them to life in our region” Claire Birch

“I feel like My New Neighbour gives us the opportunity to harness the positivity of our communities and the kindness of the Australian society to finally make a change in the field of refugee rights” Margherita Mezzasoma

These campaign leads have the skills, knowledge and passion to help you on your My New Neighbour journey and to help you develop the plan for your community to bring them along with us on the road to refuge so look out for them in your region.

Rohingya Campaign Update

Since we launched the Rohingya crisis campaign in August momentum has been building and thanks to the hard work of activists across Australia our campaign calls are being heard.

Just last week Foreign Minister Marise Payne announced the Australian Government is considering options in response to the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission to Myanmar’s report. This report included targeted sanctions against key individuals in the Myanmar military, which Amnesty International specifically named in our June report calling for accountability for the ethnic cleansing campaign committed against the Rohingya people.

This is a vital first step to the Rohingya people getting justice.

Activists have been instrumental in the campaign making sure the Australian public is informed that the extreme violence being experienced by the Rohingya people is not at the hands of rogue soldiers but highly orchestrated, systematic attacks by the Myanmar security forces. Security forces that the Australian government continues to provide funding, training and other support too.

Activists will keep up the pressure until The Australian Government cuts its ties with the Myanmar military. 

Join the call to action and get involved in your region today by contacting your local community organiser.

Israel/OPT: Six Palestinians killed within 24 hours, some deaths may involve war crimes

The deaths of six Palestinians within just 24 hours is a horrific demonstration of the unnecessary or excessive force deployed by Israeli forces against Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), Amnesty International said today.

Between 10pm on Monday 17 September and 8pm on Tuesday 18 September, Israeli forces killed four Palestinian men in the Gaza Strip using live ammunition . Within the same period, two more died as a result of the actions of Israeli forces in the West Bank, one after being beaten during the process of arrest and another shot dead in a busy street in East Jerusalem.

“The shocking fact that five Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli authorities and one died in their custody in just 24 hours is a chilling demonstration of the utter disregard for right to life.”

Saleh Higazi, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

“The shocking fact that five Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli authorities and one died in their custody in just 24 hours is a chilling demonstration of the utter disregard for right to life. Several of these incidents appear to involve deliberate and wilful killing of unarmed civilians and may amount to war crimes,” said Saleh Higazi, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

“It is the fact that such crimes are rarely, if ever, punished that allows unlawful killings and other violations of the right to life to continue in shameless disregard of international law. These incidents are not new in the OPT and are likely to continue unless this cycle of impunity is broken.”

On Monday 17 September two Palestinian men were killed during an Israeli air strike that targeted them on the southern Gaza Strip. Gaza’s health ministry identified them as Naji Jamil Abu Assi, 18, and Alaa Ziyad Abu Assi, 21. The Israeli military has claimed that the men were targeted because they approached the Gaza-Israel boundary fence and placed a “suspicious object” nearby.

Information that Amnesty International collected confirms that the two men were unarmed and that there were no indications that they posed any imminent threat that justified using lethal force against them. The reason for their presence at the site remains unclear.

On Tuesday 18 September, Israeli soldiers shot and killed two other Palestinian men in the Gaza Strip. Gaza’s health ministry identified the men as Mohammad Ahmad Abu Naji, 34, and Ahmad Mohammad Muhsin Omar, 20. They were participating in the ongoing protests against Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip and in support of the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, known as the “Great March of Return”, which began in March 2018. Israeli forces shot the two men in the chest with live bullets despite them not posing any immediate or serious threat.

Since 30 March, more than 180 Palestinians, including at least 29 children, have been killed and over 17,000 others injured in the Israeli military response to the “Great March of Return” protests held along the Israel-Gaza fence. Amnesty International has not documented any instances where protesters posed an imminent threat to the lives of Israeli soldiers and snipers, who have been located behind the fence, protected by military equipment, sand hills, drones and military vehicles.

Also on Tuesday, another Palestinian, Mohammed al-Khatib al-Rimawi, 24, died after he was brutally beaten by Israeli forces as they were arresting him at his home in the village of Beit Rima in the West Bank district of Ramallah.

His family told Amnesty International that around 40 Israeli soldiers arrived in a civilian minibus and that 15 of them burst into the family home in a pre-dawn raid on Tuesday, assaulting Mohammad while he was still lying in bed. The Israeli forces severely beat Mohammad and carried him away while unconscious. The family was informed of his death a few hours later, at around 9am, through a phone call from the Palestinian authorities. An autopsy is expected to take place on Thursday 20 September in presence of the victim’s lawyers.

On the same day, another young Palestinian man, Mohammed Yousef Sha’aban Elayyan, 26, from Qalandia refugee camp near Jerusalem, was shot dead by Israeli police near the Damascus Gate of the Old City in East Jerusalem. Israeli police alleged that the shooting occurred to prevent a stabbing attempt on the start of the Jewish fasting day of Yom Kippur. No Israelis were reported injured in the incident.

Israeli police issued a statement saying the Palestinian man ran towards a Jewish man near Jerusalem’s Old City and knocked him to the ground, then ran away while waving a sharp object at officers who opened fire on him.

Israeli police released security camera footage that they said showed the incident from multiple angles, including images of Mohammed moving towards the Israeli forces with a sharp object before he was shot dead. It is not clear that the Israeli forces had no choice but to use lethal force.

“Israel has a duty to immediately launch an independent, thorough and transparent investigation into each of these incidents and all other incidents which may involve the use of unnecessary or excessive force, torture and other ill-treatment against Palestinian civilians. We call on the Israeli authorities to hold those found responsible for these grave violations to account through fair trials. Until this happens we will not see an end to Israeli forces’ random and apparently senseless killing and violence,” said Saleh Higazi.

“The international community must also take concrete steps to stop the delivery and trade of arms and military equipment to Israel. A failure to do so fuels serious human rights violations against millions of men, women and children suffering the consequences of 50 years of military occupation, including 11 years of blockade in the Gaza strip.”

Australian Government sanctions against Myanmar military ‘would be a welcome first step’ in accountability for Rohingya abuse

In response to Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne’s announcement today that the Government is considering options in response to the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission to Myanmar’s report, including targeted sanctions, Amnesty International’s National Director Claire Mallinson said,

“Amnesty International Australia welcomes Minister Payne’s consideration of targeted sanctions against key individuals in the Myanmar military, as detailed in the UN Fact-finding Mission to Myanmar’s final report. Sanctions would be a welcome first step in achieving accountability for the crimes against humanity committed by the Myanmar military against the Rohingya people.

“Amnesty International has been calling on the Australian Government to impose sanctions on the same six men as well as seven other individuals we have named as implicated in committing crimes against humanity during the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya population in northern Rakhine State.

“If any of the named 13 have financial interests in Australia, the Australian Government must impose targeted economic sanctions upon them.

“If any of the named 13 travel here, Australia should exercise universal jurisdiction by arresting them and trying them here.

“The Australian Government must also cut Australia’s training support to the Tatmadaw – $398,000 was allocated in the ‘17/18 Budget – and explore all avenues for accountability and justice for the crimes committed in Myanmar, in particular an immediate mechanism for evidence collection and preservation for future criminal prosecutions at the International Criminal Court.

“The explosion of violence – including murder, rape, torture, burning and forced starvation – perpetrated by Myanmar’s security forces in villages across northern Rakhine State was not the action of rogue soldiers or units. There is a mountain of evidence that this was part of a highly orchestrated, systematic attack on the Rohingya population.

Background

Amnesty International’s 27 June report ’We Will Destroy Everything’: Military Responsibility for Crimes against Humanity in Rakhine State, Myanmar, names 13 members of the Myanmar military – including the six named in the UN Fact-finding Mission to Myanmar’s final report tabled yesterday – as needing to be referred to the International Criminal Court for committing crimes against humanity against the Rohingya people in northern Rakhine State.

Human rights tragedies in WA could have been prevented

With three preventable human rights tragedies in Western Australia in less than two weeks, Amnesty International’s Perth-based Indigenous Rights Manager Tammy Solonec reflects on the sadness felt by community and changes that must happen.

It has been just over a week since two Aboriginal boys drowned in the Derbarl Yerrigan (Swan River) after being chased by police. I still can’t believe it happened, and in such tragic and preventable circumstances. As a community we are still coming to terms with it. A beautiful ceremony was held at the weekend to acknowledge the lives of the boys lost and set their spirits free. So many hearts are breaking.

This is our our third preventable human rights tragedy on Noongar Boodja in less than two weeks. For me it has been a triple barrel, because I live here, have empathy and lived experience, and because of my work as the Indigenous Rights Manager for Amnesty International.

On Sunday 3 September a 22-year-old refugee Mr Aljhelie attempted to end his life at the Yongah Hill Immigration Detention Centre in Northam, about an hour east of Perth. This resulted in a disturbance at the centre as people protested his treatment. Most media outlets reported it as a riot, with one outlet focusing on the waste of taxpayers’ money instead of the man on his deathbed. His life support was switched off on Wednesday 5 September, RIP.

My dad was a refugee born in Northam who spent his very early years at Yongah Hill when it was a place of refuge called Holden Camp. It is now a prison, where foreign nationals are detained before they are deported. It shows how far we as a society have gone backwards.

On the same day the horror was happening at Yongah, Anthony Harvey allegedly killed his wife Mara Quinn and their three tiny children in Bedford, as well as her mother the next day. We did not know this until the following Sunday when the bodies were found. I went to school with Mara. Even now as I’m writing this the tributes, shock and sadness from classmates keep coming through, RIP.

Then, on Tuesday 11 September we woke to distressing news that boys had drowned in the Derbarl Yerrigan after being chased by police. At first it was reported that one boy had passed, then two, and they were looking for a third. By the end of the day it had been confirmed the third boy was safe, and the two who had passed were Aboriginal. Family and community leaders are now starting to speak out and mourn the boys, RIP.

Whilst many of us grieve, others seem happy they passed. The comments on social media are absolutely disgraceful, left there to pierce us by mainstream media outlets with little to no moderation.

I have lived in Perth for 26 years, and have raised my children here, who are both now young adults. I have witnessed the difficulties they and their friends go through, and how hard it is to be a young person in Perth. Especially a young Aboriginal person.

Everything is harder and more complicated than when I was younger. Everything is more expensive and wages have hardly risen. School is harder, it’s harder for them to get their driver’s license, it’s harder for them to get a job, it’s harder for them to find and afford a safe place to live and its harder for them to get social security. On top of that they are dealing with social media and complex relationships with their peers, and they are much more likely to come from a broken home than when I was their age.

I’ve been working on youth justice, managing Amnesty’s Indigenous rights work and the ‘Community Is Everything’ campaign in Perth since 2014. Before that I was at the National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples, and before that the Aboriginal Legal Service of WA.

For many years the organisations I have worked for have argued for justice reform in WA. There have been so many recommendations directed at the WA Government through reports, inquiries and by the United Nations. We’ve exposed human rights abuses and advocated for Indigenous-led solutions and alternatives to detention. We’ve called for policy and law reform, such as ending solitary confinement and mandatory sentencing, and raising the age of criminal responsibility around Australia, including in Queensland and the Northern Territory. But it is very difficult to get traction here in WA.

I feel so frustrated that the evidence base is not being followed and so angry that children are dying. My only hope is that the tragic passing of these two boys will not be in vain and that we can finally get some traction in justice reform here in WA.

We’ve been arguing for a justice reinvestment framework in WA for almost a decade and although there are trials underway in most states, WA has yet to commit. We need to completely review the Young Offenders Act and the youth justice system, and improvements are needed to police practices to avoid these situations.

We must also prioritise the safety of women and children in domestic violence situations and provide more help to families who are struggling.

And the Federal Government must reconsider the cruel and inhumane immigration policies which are affecting so many lives, with so little room for help, appeal or compassion.

All of these human rights tragedies must lead to change. We can and must do better. The safety of women, children and people in detention must be prioritised.

Raise the Age: Experts call on Queensland Government to stop locking up 10-year-olds

A broad cross-section of medical, children’s welfare, criminology, legal, Indigenous and human rights experts from around Australia have united with one voice, calling on Queensland’s Minister for Child Safety, Youth and Women Di Farmer to raise the minimum age that Queensland locks up children, from 10 to 14.

Members of all Queensland political parties were invited to a roundtable with seven experts at Brisbane Parliament House today, Wednesday 19 September.

Amnesty International also released a new briefing paper, The Sky is the Limit, outlining how Queensland is creating more adult offenders by locking up children as young as 10 years old. Such young children are three times more likely to become chronic adult offenders than children who are first locked up at age 14 or over.

With the new Queensland Youth Justice Strategy due for completion in November, the timing is crucial for Attorney General Yvette D’ath and Minister Farmer to make the shift.

Queensland locks up the highest number of 10- to 13-year-old children of any state or territory in Australia, and the cross-sector experts are calling for the state government to show national leadership and be the first in the country to raise this age.

Belinda Lowe, Amnesty International’s Indigenous Rights Campaigner, said: “The latest medical evidence shows children must not be locked up before the age of 14, which also is the recommendation from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. The median age kids are first locked up around the world is 14, so it’s time Queensland caught up, and stopped harming such very young children.”

“The latest medical evidence shows children must not be locked up before the age of 14, which also is the recommendation from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. The median age kids are first locked up around the world is 14, so it’s time Queensland caught up, and stopped harming such very young children” – Amnesty International’s Indigenous Rights Campaigner Belinda Lowe

 

The experts at the roundtable included University of Technology Sydney’s Criminology Professor Chris Cunneen; Lady Cilento Hospital Paediatrician Dr Li-Zsa Tan from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians; University of Queensland Honorary Fellow and expert in Alcohol Related Developmental Disorders, Janet Hammill and Red Dust Healing’s co-founder Randall Ross.

They were joined by representatives from the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service, the Human Rights Law Centre and Brisbane’s Youth Advocacy Centre, as well as Amnesty’s Belinda Lowe.

While these experts come from very different sectors, they have the same message for Minister Di Farmer: the solution is to raise the minimum age of criminality to 14 and to  support young 10- to 13-year-old children to stay out of the justice system, through community-led programs.

“Young children must be held accountable for their actions and learn right from wrong, and all the evidence shows that the best way to do that is through guidance and mentoring, within the support of family and community,” said Belinda Lowe.

This echoes the findings in the recent Youth Justice Review, led by ex-Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson, that the Queensland Government would prevent offending and give Queensland children a much better chance of overcoming problems in their young lives by supporting them through community-led programs.

“It’s essential that Minister Farmer makes raising the age to 14 a cornerstone of the new youth justice strategy before the end of the year,” said Belinda Lowe.